Archive for December, 2008

Mortgage rates hit 4-year low

Monday, December 15th, 2008

Rates for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages are at a four-year low this week after a government report of massive layoffs in November pushed bond yields down, Freddie Mac reported.

The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 5.47 percent with an average 0.7 point for the week ending Dec. 11, down from 5.53 percent last week and 6.11 percent a year ago. The rate hasn’t been lower since March 25, 2004, when it averaged 5.4 percent.

The 15-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 5.2 percent with an average 0.7 point, down from 5.33 last week and 5.78 percent a year ago.

“Following the release of the November employment report, which showed the largest monthly decline in jobs since December 1974, bond yields fell slightly this week allowing fixed-rate mortgage rates room to ease back a little further,” said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac vice president and chief economist.

Rates on adjustable-rate mortgages, however, headed in the opposite direction.

Five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) averaged 5.82 percent with an average 0.6 point, up from 5.77 last week but down from 5.89 percent a year ago.

One-year Treasury-indexed ARMs averaged 5.09 percent with an average 0.4 point, up from 5.02 percent last week but down 5.5 percent from a year ago.

Looking back to the week ending Dec. 5, the Mortgage Bankers Association said applications for mortgages fell 7.1 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis, with applications for purchase loans falling 17.4 percent. Applications for refinance loans were essentially flat, declining by 0.9 percent from the previous week, the MBA said in releasing the results of its weekly survey.

***

 

Important Info for dropping Interest Rates- not the time to wait!

Friday, December 5th, 2008

New broadcasts last night responded to information released regarding the government’s initiative to inspire home sales by reducing interest rates to 4.5%. I have already received calls from customers inquiring about whether or not this will affect their financing. The challenge with releasing information before it actually happens is it may or may not actually go through. Even more important, if the plan does take effect the 4.5% rates will not likely apply to everyone. As with any government initiative we have seen recently, what is first introduced is not always the end result.

 

With this in mind it is important to keep our customers informed of the facts. While I can’t tell you if, when or how this 4.5% will play out in the market, I can say that it won’t likely happen until February 2009. In addition, it will likely only benefit those looking to purchase new homes. This will certainly be great news for new homebuyers in early 2009. At the same time my hope is current buyers won’t be deterred by a possible rate drop that may or may not occur until February of next year.

 

Attached is an article in the Wall Street Journal that you can forward on to anyone who may inquire about 4.5% interest rates. I hope you will find it helpful.

In the meantime, it is important to reinforce that interest rates are extremely low right now. The market is volatile and rates shift daily. Right now the 30 year is trading anywhere from 5.125%-5.375% depending on the loan structure and the 15 year is between 4.875%-5%. FHA rates are also in the low 5’s depending on credit score.

 

 

 

U.S. Eyes Plan to Lift Home Sales

REAL ESTATE

 

DECEMBER 4, 2008

Treasury Considers Encouraging Banks to Offer Mortgages at Rates as Low as 4.5%

By

 

DEBORAH SOLOMON and

DAMIAN PALETTA

WASHINGTON — The Treasury Department is considering a plan to revitalize

the U.S. home market that would push down interest rates for loans to purchase

a home, according to people familiar with the matter.

The plan, which is in the development stage, would temporarily use the clout of

mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to encourage banks to lend at rates

as low as 4.5%, more than a full point lower than prevailing rates for standard

30-year fixed-rate mortgages.

Government officials are under pressure to address falling home prices and

mounting foreclosures, which underpin the financial crisis. The Treasury has

struggled for months to come up with a plan that would ease the strains on

borrowers without appearing to bail out homeowners and lenders.

The plan remains in discussion and may not be made final before the Bush

administration’s term ends in January. President-elect Barack Obama has said

repeatedly that his administration would do more than the current one to help

struggling homeowners but he has not offered specifics.

Treasury views this plan as potentially halting the slide in home prices by

enabling borrowers to afford bigger loans, thus increasing demand and pushing

up home values. The lower interest rates would be available only to borrowers

who are buying a home, not those refinancing a mortgage.

Borrowers would have to qualify for a mortgage guaranteed by Fannie, Freddie

or the Federal Housing Administration. Those guarantees apply to loans where

borrowers can document their income and afford their monthly payments,

steering the government away from backing loans considered risky.

The Treasury and the Federal Reserve are already working to bring mortgage

rates down through a program announced last week in which the Fed will buy up

to $600 billion of debt issued or backed by Fannie and Freddie, along with

Ginnie Mae and the Federal Home Loan Banks. That move helped push down

U.S. Eyes Plan to Lift Home Sales - WSJ.com Page 1 of 4

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB122833771718976731-lMyQjAxMDI4MjA4NDM… 12/5/2008

Benefit To Stocks

rates on 30-year mortgages, and applications to refinance have jumped, the

Mortgage Bankers Association said Wednesday.

In this climate, stocks of banks and home builders drew more investor attention

Wednesday, helping the Dow Jones Industrial Average rise 172.60 points, or

2.05%, to 8591.69, despite continued bleak economic news in the Fed’s “beige

book” survey of regional conditions.

The plan the Treasury is considering would encourage banks to issue new

mortgages at lower rates by offering to purchase securities underpinning the

loans at a price equivalent to the 4.5% rate.

The Treasury would fund the purchases by issuing Treasury debt at 3%,

suggesting the government could make a profit on the difference.

The average rate on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages conforming to Fannie’s and

Freddie’s standards was about 5.75% Wednesday, according to HSH Associates, a

financial publisher. That’s up from about 5.5% Monday but down from more

than 6% before last week’s announcement.

The plan is very similar to an idea floated in October by R. Glenn Hubbard and

Christopher Mayer, academics at Columbia University’s Business School. “I think

a program to substantially bring down rates for homebuyers would be an

incredibly valuable program, and I think it captures a real part of solving what

has been an incredibly challenging dislocation in the credit markets,” Mr. Mayer

said in an interview. He estimated the idea under consideration could quickly

help 1.5 million to 2.5 million people buy homes, giving a major boost to the

housing market and broader economy.

The plan also could be good news for banks hit hard by the housing slowdown. In

addition to having the government play the role of guaranteed buyer, financial

institutions could pocket fees for making loans to buyers able to afford homes at

the lower rates. That, in turn, could boost the economy and improve the weak

outlook for other consumer loans, such as credit cards, that also are weighing

heavily on the banking industry’s profitability.

Normally, the rates lenders charge consumers, including home buyers, are

determined by the secondary market, in which investors buy mortgages or

mortgage-backed securities. But Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson views

lowering mortgage rates as key to fixing the housing crisis; hence the mortgagesecurity-

buying program announced last week.

“The most important thing we can do to mitigate foreclosures and progress

through the housing correction,” Mr. Paulson said in a speech Monday, “is to

U.S. Eyes Plan to Lift Home Sales - WSJ.com Page 2 of 4

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB122833771718976731-lMyQjAxMDI4MjA4NDM… 12/5/2008

The Refinancing Picture

reduce the cost of mortgage finance, so more families can afford to buy a home

and so homeowners can refinance into more affordable mortgages.”

Fannie, Freddie, their regulator and the Department of Housing and Urban

Development — which oversees the FHA — all declined to comment. “The

Secretary has said repeatedly that we are looking at a number of options to help

homeowners,” said Treasury Spokeswoman Jennifer Zuccarelli.

On the refinancing front, the Mortgage Bankers Association said its index of

refinance applications had tripled from the previous week, the largest increase

since it began tracking such data in 1990. Applications to buy homes, which tend

to be less sensitive to interest-rate movements, also increased, by a smaller

amount.

Application volume remains lower than it was as recently as March. Last week’s

numbers are adjusted for a shortened holiday week, which can make

comparisons more difficult.

The Treasury plan is similar to ideas previously floated by the National

Association of Realtors and the lobby group for home builders, but has skeptics.

“I don’t think it’s the answer to the foreclosure problem because that problem is a

combination of negative equity with unemployment,” said Mark Zandi, chief

economist of Moody’s Economy.com.

Mr. Paulson has been wrestling for months with ways to stem foreclosures. The

Bush administration has supported mostly voluntary efforts to get the mortgage

industry to help borrowers in danger of losing their homes and has resisted calls

to use taxpayer money to bail out homeowners. Those voluntary efforts have had

only a limited impact as home prices continue to fall and foreclosures to rise.

The administration has been split about its approach, with Federal Deposit

Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair floating a proposal to use $24 billion from

the government’s $700 billion financial rescue fund to provide a federal

guarantee on roughly two million modified mortgages.

Her plan was a hit with Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill but fell

flat with the White House, where some speculated the FDIC plan could cost $70

billion to $80 billion. Mr. Paulson has expressed reservations about the plan on

the ground that it would spend taxpayer money, instead of investing it, and that

it could encourage banks to foreclose and borrowers to halt payments. Treasury

staff have been working on a plan to improve Ms. Bair’s model, but Mr. Paulson

has so far resisted implementing it over concerns that it costs too much and

might not be all that effective.

U.S. Eyes Plan to Lift Home Sales - WSJ.com Page 3 of 4

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB122833771718976731-lMyQjAxMDI4MjA4NDM… 12/5/2008

—Robin Sidel, Ruth Simon and James R. Hagerty contributed to this article.

Resolving the crisis is likely to fall to Mr. Obama. He reiterated his position on

Wednesday, saying, “We’ve got to start helping homeowners in a serious way,

prevent foreclosures.” Some Treasury officials are frustrated that the Obama

team has not provided more specifics about what it would like the Treasury to do

to help homeowners.

Write to

 

Deborah Solomon at deborah.solomon@wsj.com and Damian Paletta

Government May Try to Push Down Mortgage Rates

Friday, December 5th, 2008

Some good news for buyers who are qualified to buy!


Treasury plan could offer home buyers government-backed loans with fixed rate of 4.5 percent.
By:
Alison Rice

The Treasury Department is reportedly considering a plan to bolster the housing market with low-interest government-backed mortgages for home buyers.

The approach, first reported by the Wall Street Journal yesterday afternoon, would allow banks to offer fixed-rate 30-year home loans at interest rates as low as 4.5 percent to home buyers who qualify for government-backed financing. This would include home loans made through the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or conforming mortgages eligible for purchase or guarantee by mortgage finance firms Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. “Treasury views this plan as potentially halting the slide in home prices by enabling borrowers to afford bigger loans, thus increasing demand and pushing up home values,” according to the Journal’s story.

In a move that could be significant for builders, the plan would apply only to home purchases, not refinancing an existing mortgage. That means would-be home shoppers would now have two big reasons to finally buy a house: low interest rates and bargain prices.

Of course, those low, low prices also remind consumers of how much home prices have fallen in recent months, which also has made them reluctant to buy.

“In our view, confidence of potential home buyers that prices are unlikely to deteriorate further is the primary factor today as traditional affordability metrics are back to acceptable levels,” analyst Ivy Zelman said today in a report discussing the Treasury plan. “Unless the government can end the downward foreclosure spiral, we believe that consumers will be unwilling to purchase a home when there exists a high probability that their down payment could be eliminated in a short amount of time by further home price deflation.”

She added: “With that said, lower funding costs have to be considered an incremental positive and could further fuel foreclosure purchases that have been helping to clear excess inventory from the market.”

Reducing the number of both foreclosed and new inventory homes is critical to the health of the housing market, which is considered by many to be both the source of and a partial solution to the country’s current economic ills. As such, the Treasury continues to explore ways to stabilize the financial markets and residential real estate, as Neel Kashkari, interim assistant secretary for financial stability, said today in testimony before a Senate appropriations subcommittee.

“On December 1, Secretary Paulson underscored the critical priorities for the most effective deployment of remaining TARP funds, foremost of which is to ensure our banking sector has the necessary capital base to continue lending to consumers and businesses and support economic growth, and to help homeowners avoid preventable foreclosures,” Kashkari said. “… [W]e continue to aggressively examine strategies to mitigate foreclosures and maximize loan modifications, which are a necessary part of working through the necessary housing correction and maintaining the strength of our communities.”

Alison Rice is senior editor, online, at BUILDER magazine.

U.S. Rethinks Roles of Fannie, Freddie

Thursday, December 4th, 2008

Here is a great article from the wall street journal that gives more information about what has happened with the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae rolls for lending and such. Right now getting financing approved is the biggest challenge for any person in the real estate market.

America’s $11 trillion home-mortgage market is heading for a makeover.

Mortgage lending in the U.S. relies heavily on institutions set up in the 1930s by politicians and government officials seeking remedies for the Great Depression. Now, bankers say, the current economic crisis will force Congress and the Obama administration to decide how to repair or rebuild those institutions, including Fannie Mae, the Federal Home Loan Banks and the Federal Housing Administration.

The main focus is on the government-backed buyers of home loans: Fannie Mae, created in 1938, and its younger cousin, Freddie Mac, formed in 1970. Heavy losses stemming from mortgage defaults prompted regulators to seize control of the two companies Sept. 6. Though hobbled by those losses, Fannie and Freddie still buy or guarantee more than half of all home loans in the U.S.

The Treasury Department has agreed to provide them capital as needed, and the Federal Reserve said last week that it would spend as much as $600 billion buying debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by Fannie and Freddie over several quarters.

The consensus among both Republicans and Democrats is that the current structure of Fannie and Freddie doesn’t work. Though they are owned mainly by private shareholders, they have a public mission to support the housing market. That has led to conflicts between shareholders’ desire for maximum profits and congressional demands for more support to the housing industry.

[fanfred]

A series of policy options compiled from various sources by Andrew Davidson, a mortgage-industry consultant, calls for turning Fannie and Freddie into cooperatives owned by the lenders that sell mortgages to them. These cooperatives would package mortgages into securities for sale to investors. Unlike Fannie and Freddie, the cooperatives wouldn’t own large amounts of loans and related securities on their books. To make the securities more attractive to investors, Treasury would receive fees for agreeing to cover any losses on the securities above a certain level.

This explicit backing from Treasury would replace the current system under which investors merely assumed that the government would stand behind Fannie and Freddie. Many investors, especially those overseas, have lost confidence in that “implied” guarantee and want something definite.

This approach would take away from Fannie and Freddie their traditional duties of ensuring liquidity in the market by buying mortgage securities when other investors back away and of making special efforts to finance housing for poor people. If Congress sees a need for such functions, Mr. Davidson says, it should set up government programs to achieve them and allocate funds for those purposes.

A complication is that home builders and Realtors, both powerful lobbying groups, argue for a continuing federal role for Fannie and Freddie to ensure a steady flow of money into home mortgages, even when private investors recoil from the risk. Bank-controlled cooperatives, on their own, wouldn’t provide the degree of support for housing that these lobbying groups want.

Rep. Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat who is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, will have a key role in this debate. He doesn’t favor the status quo; the “hybrid system” of private shareholders and a public mission “didn’t work well,” he said in a recent interview. Rep. Frank said there may be a case for separating their current functions into different entities, one to finance housing that is affordable for low- and moderate-income people and another to ensure adequate funding for the mortgage market in general.

Congress also may tinker with the 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks, which lend money to more than 8,000 commercial banks, thrifts, credit unions and insurers. These loans are a big source of funding for mortgages. But the home-loan banks also borrow based on an implied guarantee that no longer looks so attractive to many investors. Mr. Davidson says the home-loan banks may have to pay fees for an explicit government guarantee of their debt.